In 1995 I filed a civil complaint against Oracle Corporation, in San Mateo Superior Court, where the case is known as CIV393104.

Based on information and belief, Juana Schurman (#121049) represented Oracle Corporation and was in charge of the case internally, reporting directly to Raymond Lumalu Ocampo Jr (#7213), who gave her direction and instruction.

In response to our motion for discovery, Juana Schurman, on behalf of Oracle Corporation and overseen by Raymond Ocampo, denied that any of the events that I described had occurred, and insisted that no business records existed related to the events I had described.

Retrospective analysis also revealed that Ms Schurman, overseen by Mr Ocampo, concealed the existence of one witness (Lisa Cussary, 506-2421) from discovery, as well as withholding the contents of Alan Tottle's and other managers' executive diaries, and arranging for the manager of Oracle Corporation's Human Resources Department (Michael Satterwhite) to take an unscheduled multi-week vacation, to Paris ... in January ... so that he was never deposed.

In May, June and July of 2021, consequent to my younger brother's death, I discovered physical copies of the electronic mails that Oracle Corporation had denied the existence of, under oath, in San Mateo Superior Court.

(See attached letter to California Department of Justice, dated 11 July 2021, for a detailed chronology of events that led to the discovery of these materials, their authentication, and supporting exhibits.)

It is my analysis that Juana Schurman and Raymond Ocampo were the agents primarily responsible for Oracle Corporation engaging in fraud, perjury, conspiracy, spoliation, and obstruction of justice, in this case.

Additional corroboration may be acquired and ultimate liability ascertained by examining the pattern of bonuses received by Ms Schurman and Mr Ocampo from Oracle Corporation during the years 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 (to establish a baseline), 1995 (the year the case was filed), 1996 (the year the case was dismissed, for lack of evidence) and perhaps 1997 (more baseline), looking for a large bonus, an all-expenses-paid vacation, or both, in 1996, after the case was dismissed. Ms Schurman's bonuses would have all been approved by Mr Ocampo.

NOTE:

The "allegations of attorney misconduct where a person who is incapacitated, infirm, disabled, etc was victimized" stem from the fact that Mr Satterwhite had compelled me to take a two-week-long medical leave of absence and as a condition of returning to work had insisted that I see a psychiatrist and provide written approval from that psychiatrist - which privileged information was obviously available to both Ms Schurman and Mr Ocampo.

The allegations of attorney misconduct where a person who is incapacitated, was victimized, also stem from the fact that Oracle Corporation's Legal Department specifically questioned me about McAuley, without prompting, during my own deposition - indicating an imperfect prior knowledge that I had previously been a patient at McAuley Neuropsychiatric Hospital - although they did not seem to be aware that those events had occurred during my adolescence or that they had involved my mother foolishly giving me Quaaludes as a pain medication.

See attached, unsolicited electronic mail sent to me just a few days ago, as evidence that the topic of my two-week-long stay at McAuley, in 1976, is still a topic of discussion, today ... and yet, the only time it has ever been publicly mentioned, in nearly sixty years, was during my deposition, in CIV393104.

NEXT: California State Bar complaint against Raymond Ocampo